Tuesday, 26 November 2013

ethics in media


I will be looking into the different ethics that are though about when creating different TV shows and how to ensure that the people involved will be safe and are fit to take part on the shows.
Ethics in the media department is the moral principles that define how a person or a group of people act. Some of the most important ethical constraints that TV producers must take into account are
  • Trust
  • Liability
  • Truth
  • Privacy
  • Serving the public's interest
The key constraints are very important as without following these it would be extremely difficult to create TV shows.
The ethics behind different styles of TV shows varies depending on the situation. for example with reality TV, you take celebrities or strangers that have never met, you don't know anything about them and don't know how the fame from being on TV will effect them. On shows such as X Factor, I'm a celebrity get me out of here, Big Brother members of the production team must put the participants through a series of tests to find out if they are mentally/physically fit to take part of the show. If you were to just put anyone on the shows without finding out the health of these people the fame could send them spiralling out of control, and in some cases causing them to lead to drug and alcohol abuse or even suicide. As well as the mental health the physical health is also an issue. if you are physically unfit to take part in certain reality shows like I'm a celebrity the shows consists of different tasks that endeavour fitness, being in confined spaces, eating edible creatures and participating in adrenalin challenge that involve being at high heights.
With drama shows it is a different ethical procedure as they are actors fitting a role, but as drama is based on real life, real life situations will become major story lines for example rape, murder, bullying, death. When drama shows are portraying these situations it is extremely important to take into account the people who are viewing the show, being careful not to make the scenes too graphic or revealing too much of what is going on. a lot of soap operas get around this by using the other senses of the audience instead of their eyes. For example in coronation Street there is a storyline which evolved a malicious bullying scene with children, but instead of showing you every detail of what happened they began by showing mild, minor actions, cutting the scene and re-opening after the attack had taken place. As well as this they also revealed a video clip but again the attack wasn't shown but instead the voices on the video were heard which made you realise what happened without actually showing you. It is also important to be caring towards the audience. as the story lines are based on real life situations these cases are more than likely to of happened to a number of the people watching the show at home. a popular way of using ethics in this situation besides not showing the attack them selves is by adding warnings and helplines at the beginning and ends of the shows which gives people the opportunity to talk with someone about what they have went through and if it has affected them or to not watch the show at all.
when members of the public take part on talk shows such as Jerry Springer, Jeremy Kyle and Maury, you must consider that the people on the shows are more than likely to have people living in there area watching or that the content of the shows could damage there life/reputation. Take Jeremy Kyle as an example. The largest reason for people going onto the show is to get paternity test. in these situations many families could be attending the show with full intention that they are 99% certain of who the biological parents are, and on many occasions have been distraught about the outcome. TV producers get through these tough experiences by providing a support team who are there to help you get through the situation. Same with Jerry Springer. it is well known for allowing people to vent there anger issues out by fighting. to ensure that the situation doesn't get out of hand and people are not hurt physically there are security guards present at all times during the show, on stage and off.
Comedy shows are different compared to the rest of the styles of shows. A lot of comedy shows have been caught out on racial, sexist, religious, celebrities and government jokes and sketches which are more than likely to offend members of the public. what a lot of comedy shows do in order to ensure that are not sued for their use of these sketches is by not singling out one person. for example. In family guy it has occurred more times that possible where they have made jokes regarding celebrities, whether that is from cases they have been accused of by paparazzi, there appearance or the private lives. they have made sure that they use a variety of different celebrities to joke about other than just the one.
When creating current affairs TV documentaries there are numerous different ethics that can be used in place of hiding the identity of people. As you are visiting areas where it is almost impossible to get every single persons consent to be shown or a lot of the people don't want to be shown at all. With shows such as Panorama where hidden cameras visit places such as care homes, schools and hospitals to uncover what it is actually like, almost all of the people shown are filmed without consent. to protect the identities of these people the editorial crew can blur out faces, not display names and when people are giving evidence they tend to change their voices. If the identities of these people were not kept hidden depending on the story there lives could become at risk, people may not believe what they are saying or may disagree with there opinions. also if they are employees and it was shown they were giving away information they could loose their jobs. Not only is it a case of hiding the identities of those that need to be, current affairs is hard hitting real life situations and it can tend to effect the audience seeing mental health patients. A procedure that is used often in these cases are help lines and warning signs at the beginning and end of the show, for members of the audience that have issues related to the show they have just watched.

It is extremely important for TV producers to think about the different ethics that need to be put into place when creating any genre of a TV show, if the show was to be aired with no ethics or constraints it could cause havoc within the audience with complaints, protests, banning of the show and suing the producers involved. Some of the guidelines that producers must work towards to ensure that they dont break the law, offend of harm the audience consist of  Harm and offence, fairness, contributors and consent, privacy,children and young people as contributors, religion and much more. each production company has their own set of guidelines here is an example of how many the BBC has.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/

Each of these guidelines go into detail of the different things to consider. with children and young people as contributors for example. You must make sure that you have consent from parents and or guardians before filming, interviewing or photographing them. the reason for this is because personal issues within the family they may not want their child's images or voice to appear on national television or radio for anyone to see. Another important guideline to follow is harm and offence. In my opinion i believe that this guideline should be set for all productions mainly because there is so much that must go into consideration from sex and nudity to violence, intimidation and humiliation. If you are making a documentary about violence and you are interviewing someone with a violent history or a history of abused you must take into consideration that it is their own personal life that you are filming and showing to people all over the country. you must not lie or give away personal information about their location, age or any of the names involved. this guideline is put in place to protect the identity of the participant.








Tuesday, 12 November 2013

Legal constraints in the creative media sectors

Through out this blog post i will be looking into the legal side of media. It is extremely important for producers to have an understanding of the legal constraints when working in media because if they are not made aware of these laws they are more than likely to break them which can lead to fines and imprisonment.
There are many laws that must be followed by all media sectors to avoid court and prison sentences.
these laws are, Libel, Obscenity,copyright,privacy and official secrets act.
It is extremely important that producers whether it is producer of film, TV, Newspaper any form of media to follow the legal constraints as if they didn't there production would likely close, they could be issued a prison sentence and fined

When breaking libel law you can be sued for damages if you publish or broadcast things about a person which are untrue and damage their reputations. This law was created to protect individuals or organisations from unwarranted, mistaken or untruthful attacks on their reputation by members or the public or hate fans. The main resource for this law to take place is through social networking sites, mainly twitter. With the ability to speak your mind on the social networking site opinions can be taken into account and out of context. Although if you were to say for example "i cant stand Katy Perry" you would not be breaking laws as it is right to your opinions, but if you were to say "i cant stand Katy perry, ever since she spat on a fan" this accusation could give the singer a false opinion of herself to other people this can lead to the libel law being taken into action. Earlier this year the QI presenter Alan Davies falsely accused Lord McAline over child sex abuse allegations. Davies tweeted to his 450'000 followers "any clues on who the Tory paedophile is?". to later re-tweet a response naming McAlpine. He later tweeted an apology and agreed to pay £15'000 in damages and issued a warning to users of the social media service about being careful with what they say.
The Obscenity law is where something is overly obscene.
         
           "So, obscenity means the use of an offensive word or expression or depicting something vulgar or morally unacceptable. The society is continuously exposed to violence and obscenity in one way or the other. We see violence and obscenity in movies, music videos, news channels, newspapers, novels, comic books, music, etc." - http://andynoronha.wordpress.com/tag/violence-and-obscenity-in-media/

An example of the obscenity law taking place was with the film 'The Davinci Code'. A short while after the Da Vinci code was released in cinemas the producers or the film were taken into investigation as they were breaking the Italian penal code. The broke this as in the film it suggests that Mary Magdalene and Jesus were married with children. this centres the on obscenity on religious grounds. it names 10 people including writer of the book Dan Brown and the director of the film Ron Howard. Another example of the obscenity law taking place is with the gory horror film sequel the human centipede 2.

"Horror movie The Human Centipede 2: Full Sequence has been effectively banned from British shores after the BBFC deemed it “unacceptable material”. The film was submitted for classification but was found to be “sexually violent” and “potentially obscene”.

The original film, directed by Tom Six, saw a mad scientist stitch together victims from 'mouth to anus' creating the 'human centipede' of the title.
Speaking about the first film, BBFC director David Cooke stated, "Although the concept of the film was undoubtedly tasteless and disgusting it was a relatively traditional and conventional horror film and the board concluded that it was not in breach of our guidelines at ‘18’.”
 
http://www.nme.com/filmandtv/news/human-centipede-sequel-too-obscene-to-be-re/217692#u876qkFjfTXJIWtS.99

The privacy law occurs when people take information without consent, take photographs of private life without permission. the most well known example of privacy law in action is from the news of the world phone hacking scandal.
"Nine years ago, in March 2002, Amanda “Milly” Dowler (aged 13) was on her way home from school. She was kidnapped and murdered and her body was found in September 2002. In June 2011, Levi Bellfield was convicted of her murder and sentenced to a “whole life” tariff. When Milly went missing, journalists of the News of the World newspaper “hacked” into her voicemail. The fact that this had happened came to public prominence in July 2011 when The Guardian newspaper revealed the story." - http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/09/18/is-the-official-secrets-act-about-to-be-used-to-gag-journalism-obiter-j/

When the news of the world hacked into the missing girls phone it was already breaking the privacy law but to then deleted messages left by worried parents of the girl making room on the already full answering machine and then revealing the story with information that could of only been provided from people first hand with the situation. the result of this hacking taking place led to the closure of the newspaper being closed

The official secrets act is a criminal offence which occurs when you obtain or publish and information from a serving or former member of the security and intelligence services, where the information could be damaging.  An example of the official secrets act taking place is when a foreign office official was charged under the official secrets act after a series of stories appeared in the new statesman and observer. Derek pasquill provided information about suspected terrorists as well as various revelations about government policy towards radical Islam.

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/oct/08/pressandpublishing.politicsandthemedia

copyright is the most known law all around the world. copyright happens when you take credit for someone else's work. it has occurred many times by millions of people whether it is known or not. it can occur by taking photos off of Google images and posted them as if they are your own or it can be serious by taking something that was created by someone else and earning money from it.
an example of copyright taking place is the case between Google and Viacom over YouTube. Viacom accused Google of posting videos without permission. Google were accused of unauthorized posting clips from "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart," "South Park," "Sponge Bob Square pants" and other programs that viewers had uploaded to YouTube.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/18/entertainment-us-google-viacom-idUSBRE93H17S20130418

http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20008636-261.html